作者:李正萍 等 日期:2023-09-02 浏览量:464
第十一届北京罕见病学术大会暨2023京津冀罕见病学术大会征文(010)
目的:对重型血友病A(SHA)伴高滴度抑制物(HTI)患儿,比较使用重组凝血因子VIII(rFVIII)或含VWF的血浆来源的FVIII(pd-FVIII/VWF)进行低剂量免疫耐受诱导治疗(ITI)效果。
方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,所有入组患儿接受低剂量ITI治疗(FVIII 50IU/kg 隔日一次),FVIII种类包括rFVIII或pd-FVIII/VWF。成功定义为连续两次抑制物转阴且回收率达标。
结果:共30例患儿入组,15例使用rFVIII进行低剂量ITI治疗,15例使用pd-FVIII/VWF进行低剂量ITI治疗。两组患儿临床基线资料没有统计学差异(见表1)。截止数据统计,rFVIII-ITI组ITI治疗中位时间10.0个月,pd-FVIII/VWF-ITI组ITI治疗中位时间12.2个月。
对于所有入组患儿,两组取得相同的ITI成功率(rFVIII-ITI组40% vs. pd-FVIII/VWF-ITI组75%)。对于ITI治疗时间≥9个月的患儿,两组取得相同的ITI成功率(rFVIII-ITI组50% vs. pd-FVIII/VWF-ITI组64.3%)。同样在ITI治疗时间≥12个月的患儿中,两组也取得相同的ITI成功率(rFVIII-ITI组55.6% vs. pd-FVIII/VWF-ITI组58.3%)。(见表2)
生存曲线提示两组患儿达到成功的时间没有统计学差异(中位时间,9.0月vs. 11.9月)。(见图1)
在含有3个ITI预后危险因素的患儿中,使用rFVIII相较于pd-FVIII/VWF进行低剂量ITI治疗似乎有更高的成功率(100% vs. 0,受限于样本量没有进行统计学分析获得p值)。(见表3)
结论:在中国,对于伴HTI的SHA患儿,使用rFVIII或pd-FVIII/VWF开展低剂量ITI治疗取得相似的ITI成功率及达成功时间。
对于含有3个ITI预后危险因素的患儿,使用rFVIII相较于pd-FVIII/VWF进行低剂量ITI治疗似乎有更高的成功率,但需要更大样本量及更长ITI随访时间支持。
图表:
Table 1 Clinical characteristics at baseline
CharacteristicsMedian (range) | All | pd-FVIII/VWF | rFVIII | p |
Age characteristics |
|
|
|
|
Age at initial bleeding, m | 8.0 (0.0, 72.0) | 12.0 (5.0, 31.0) | 6.0 (0.0, 72.0) | 0.745 |
Age at initial FVIII exposure, m | 13.5 (3.0, 120.0) | 14.0 (5.0, 64.0) | 13.0 (3.0, 120.0) | 0.929 |
Age at inhibitor diagnosis, y | 3.2 (0.1, 13.3) | 3.3 (0.9, 8.9) | 2.3 (0.1, 6.8) | 0.034 |
Age at ITI-start, y | 4.1 (1.3, 14.7) | 5.2 (2.6, 14.7) | 3.5 (1.3, 10.0) | 0.047 |
Time from inhibitor-diagnosis to ITI-start, m | 3.5 (0.2, 84.3) | 1.5 (0.2, 76.5) | 5.5 (0.2, 84.3) | 0.577 |
ED at inhibitor-diagnosis | 23.0 (3.0, 118.0) | 30.0 (15.0, 118.0) | 20.0 (3.0, 100.) | 0.205 |
Inhibitor characteristics |
|
|
|
|
Titer at inhibitor-diagnosis, BU/mL | 14.9 (0.6, 198.0) | 33.6 (3.6, 128.0) | 10.0 (0.6, 198.0) | 0.751 |
Pre-ITI titer, BU/mL | 12.8 (1.0, 1024.0) | 13.5 (1.0, 1024.0) | 14.6 (1.7, 89.6) | 0.235 |
Peak historical inhibitor titer, BU/mL | 19.7 (1.0, 1024.0) | 65.0 (3.6, 1024.0) | 22.0 (5.7, 198.0) | 0.250 |
Genetic background, N (%) |
|
|
|
|
Family history of hemophilia (n = 26) | 8 (30.8) | 3 (27.3) | 5 (33.3) | 0.543 |
Family history of inhibitor (n = 26) | 2 (7.7) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (7.7) | 0.717 |
F8 genotype (n = 29) |
|
|
| 0.653 |
High-risk | 8 (25.6) | 3 (20.0) | 5 (35.7) |
|
Medium-risk | 15 (51.7) | 9 (60.0) | 6 (42.9) |
|
Low-risk | 6 (20.7) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (21.4) |
|
Therapeutic sequences pre-inhibitor diagnosis, N (%) |
|
|
| 0.966 |
pd-FVIII/VWF + OD | 15 (50.0) | 8 (53.4) | 7 (46.7) |
|
pd-FVIII/VWF + PR | 6 (20.0) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (20.0) |
|
rFVIII + OD | 5 (16.7) | 2 (13.3) | 3 (20.0) |
|
rFVIII + PR | 4 (13.3) | 2 (13.3) | 2 (13.3) |
|
ITI time, m | 10.2 (3.1, 18.4) | 12.2 (6.0, 18.4) | 10.0 (3.1, 15.0) | 0.004 |
IS, N (%) | 13 (43.3) | 5 (33.3) | 8 (53.3) | 0.500 |
Range, maximum - minimum; ITI, immune tolerance induction; ED, exposure days; BU/mL, Bethesda Units/mL; pd-FVIII/VWF, plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate; rFVIII, recombinant factor VIII concentrate; OD, on-demand treatment; PR, prophylaxis (25 FVIII IU/kg three times weekly); y, years; m, months; F8 genotype risk-stratification based on the review article by Garagiola et al (Thromb Res. 2018;168:20-27).
Table 2 ITI outcomes by time of ITI and kinds of FVIII concentrate
Time of ITI, m | All patients, N |
| Success patients, N (%) | p | ||
rFVIII | pd-FVIII/VWF |
| rFVIII | pd-FVIII/VWF | ||
All | 15 | 15 |
| 6 (40.0) | 10 (66.7) | 0.272 |
≥6 | 12 | 14 |
| 6 (50.0) | 9 (64.3) | 0.692 |
≥9 | 9 | 12 |
| 5 (55.6) | 7 (58.3) | 1.000 |
≥12 | 3 | 8 |
| 2 (66.7) | 5 (62.5) | 1.000 |
ITI, immune tolerance induction; pd-FVIII/VWF, plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate; rFVIII, recombinant factor VIII concentrate; m, months.
Table 3 Success rate by number of poor-prognostic-factors per patient and time of ITI
Number of poor-prognostic-factors* per patient | Time of ITI, m | Success-N/all-N (%) § | |
pd-FVIII/VWF | rFVIII | ||
1 | all | 3/4 (75.0) | 2/5 (40.0) |
≥6 | 3/4 (75.0) | 2/4 (50.0) | |
≥9 | 2/3 (66.7) | 2/2 (100.0) | |
2 | all | 3/3 (100) | 3/5 (60.0) |
≥6 | 3/3 (100) | 3/5 (60.0) | |
≥9 | 3/3 (100) | 2/4 (50.0) | |
3 | all | 0/4 (0) | 1/3 (33.3) |
≥6 | 0/4 (0) | 1/1 (100) | |
≥9 | 0/4 (0) | 1/1 (100) |
ITI, immune tolerance induction; pd-FVIII/VWF, plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate; rFVIII, recombinant factor VIII concentrate; m, months.
*Poor-prognostic-factors: immediate pre-ITI inhibitor titer ≥10 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL, peak historical inhibitor titer ≥100 BU/mL, peak inhibitor titer during ITI ≥100 BU/mL and the interval-time ≥2 years from inhibitor-diagnosis to ITI-start.
§ Success-N, the number of patients achieving success; all-N, the number of all patients.(图略)
Figure 1 The time to success by treatment group
Kaplan-Meier plot showed the time to success (negative inhibitor titer twice consecutively and FVIII recovery ≥66% of expected) was similar between treatment groups (median 9.0 months in rFVIII-ITI group vs. 11.9 months in pd-FVIII-ITI group).
ITI, immune tolerance induction; pd-FVIII/VWF, plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate; rFVIII, recombinant factor VIII concentrate.